So logically, it seems we’ve proved nobody likes life. But we’re told that nobody likes change. That is, you can use it for as long as you want or until you r machine has given up on you.Change is inevitable, and a part of life. Like AutoCAD and all other similar software, SolidWorks used to sell its licenses in perpetual terms. But unlike other software, SolidWorks has not changed its license fee since it was first released in 1996 at least as far as SolidWorks Standard is concerned.Alternatively, you can purchase a new subscription directly from Autodesk or from an Autodesk Reseller. In many cases, you can view your purchase options for a new subscription by launching your expired software. Whether youre a professional-level user or hobbyist, personal computing and graphics software have forever changed the way.To use the software, simply purchase a new subscription.2D drawings can now only be single sheet, and can only be printed or plotted Perhaps most importantly to the makerverse, STEP, SAT, and IGES file types can no longer be exported, the most common files for those who want to edit a design using different software. Thankfully this still includes STL files but alas, DXF, DWG, PDF exports are all gone Exports are now limited to a small number of file types. Project storage is limited to 10 active and editable documents The clear message from Autodesk is that Fusion 360 — the widely used suite of CAD and CAM software — will still offer a free-to-use non-commercial license for design and manufacturing work, with the inclusion of a few very big “buts” that may be deal-breakers for some people.We’d say that users of Fusion 360’s free personal use license would best be advised to export everything they might ever think they need design files for immediately — if you discover you need to export them in the future, you’ll need one of the other licenses to do so.To be fair, it was pretty clear that changes to the personal use license were coming a while ago with the consolidation of paid-tier licenses almost a year ago, and the cloud-credit system that monetized rendering/simulation/generative design services happening on the Autodesk servers. All support for simulation, generative design, and custom extensions has been removedMost of these changes go into effect October 1, with the exception of the limit on active project files which goes into effect in January of 2021. CAM support has been drastically cut back: no more multi-axis milling, probing, automatic tool changes, or rapid feeds, but support for 2, 2.5, and 3 axis remains
Looking For Individual Selling Autocad Perpetual Crack For ASo it might be worth paying for. As they move away from well featured free options too it makes paying for one of their competitors software using a business model you prefer much more palatable.Also has to be said Autodesk have put in lots of quality of life and manufacturing features to make it more than just a CAD package, which many of the other options I’m aware of don’t have. It’s no different from the local drug dealer having a “free crack for a week” program.Remember when Twitter allowed third party clients, offered companies “fire hose” feeds, etc? Pepperidge farm remembers.Much as I never liked the business model when it was first free to use it was really the only good choice unless you like openscad (which is great but requires a very specific way of thinking) for free access.Now however… Freecad might be a little clunky but it does function really well so there is another option to do CAD without coughing up lots of money for the software. I was told I was being silly, that it was free/cheap and awesome.When will people learn that there are hundreds of examples of cloud apps starting out free, the companies being all interested in APIs and whatnot…and then boom, suddenly you can’t get your data out and the service costs money. Think of the tens of millions of man-hours that have been invested into forum posts helping users, developing plugins, courses, youtube videos, and makerspace workshops that could have instead gone into making open source tools like KiCAD, OpenSCAD, pycam, etc better.All that work done by hobbyists, for free, helping Autodesk dominate the market in low-end CAD/CAM software.Back when Fusion 360 came out I installed it, realized it was a freakin’ web app masquerading as a desktop app, and that all your projects were stored in their “cloud”, not local files…and warned people. To their credit, Autodesk is offering a steep discount on the commercial license right now, which might take some of the sting out of the changes.Update 09-25-2020: Autodesk has announced that STEP file export will remain in the free version of Fusion 360Posted in News Tagged autodesk, cad, cam, Fusion 360, license, personal use, software, STEP file Post navigationYup. Skyward sword emulator for macIf you show its possible to do FEA in a VM, that would prove your point- which I suspect cannot not proven. If I could run some things through VM, I would, so I wouldn’t have to do annoying dualboots.I suspect if it’s even possible, it’s highly technical, and highly hampered in hardware acceleration ability. I’ve never seen anyone pull it off- and I’ve been looking for years, in fact about a decade, for a way to do that.I hate Windows, and the only reason it exists in my house at all is because of 3d modeling and CAD/CAM software, which I and I suspect most if not all have not found a way to run in VM without actual Windows.I’m a Linux user and the only thing noone except people like FreeCAD have done has been to create a seriois version of these softwares not tied to Windows, that can actually run outside that ecosystem. ![]() Autocad is unavoidable (though it has become difficult license-wise over the last several years), Inventor has degraded, in my opinion, as the interface has become more Fusion-like rather than fixing bugs, and new bugs have been introduced over the last few years that are not being addressed, especially inthe CAM. Much of it seems to be rent-seeking.It is a powerful tool with a lot of potential, but, on the side of my work where I pay for commercial licenses, it is not used. It’s not worth it.The big problem with the constantly evolving Fusion- and I have discussed this with AD engineers several times over the last 7 years or so- is that the existing incomplete features stay incomplete, bugs don’t get fixed, yet new features are added with new bugs. JUST GET OVER looking for the $5000 package you can use for free. It’s time for non-commercial users of software to choose, nurture, and develop non-commercial software. Then AD bought it.These days, dealing with AD is like dealing with Rigol, but without the cheat codes and with the features you already paid for revocable retroactively. Never great, but powerful and stable functionality for years. Recap is very nice, but I would not buy it as a separate product (I have it as part of a bundle).The worst is what happened with Eagle. Two years of this no with no fixes, and the official response is BS ‘workarounds’ and updates that don’t fix it), but I prefer SolidWorks. Its output is usually fairly path optimized (it doesn’t jump all over the place like pycam. The adaptive machining feature is nice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorPaul ArchivesCategories |